You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
2292 lines
99 KiB
2292 lines
99 KiB
.. FIXME: move to the stylesheet or Sphinx plugin
|
|
|
|
.. raw:: html
|
|
|
|
<style>
|
|
.arc-term { font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; }
|
|
.revision { font-style: italic; }
|
|
.when-revised { font-weight: bold; font-style: normal; }
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Automatic numbering is described in this article:
|
|
* http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/automatic-numbering-with-css-counters/
|
|
*/
|
|
/*
|
|
* Automatic numbering for the TOC.
|
|
* This is wrong from the semantics point of view, since it is an ordered
|
|
* list, but uses "ul" tag.
|
|
*/
|
|
div#contents.contents.local ul {
|
|
counter-reset: toc-section;
|
|
list-style-type: none;
|
|
}
|
|
div#contents.contents.local ul li {
|
|
counter-increment: toc-section;
|
|
background: none; // Remove bullets
|
|
}
|
|
div#contents.contents.local ul li a.reference:before {
|
|
content: counters(toc-section, ".") " ";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Automatic numbering for the body. */
|
|
body {
|
|
counter-reset: section subsection subsubsection;
|
|
}
|
|
.section h2 {
|
|
counter-reset: subsection subsubsection;
|
|
counter-increment: section;
|
|
}
|
|
.section h2 a.toc-backref:before {
|
|
content: counter(section) " ";
|
|
}
|
|
.section h3 {
|
|
counter-reset: subsubsection;
|
|
counter-increment: subsection;
|
|
}
|
|
.section h3 a.toc-backref:before {
|
|
content: counter(section) "." counter(subsection) " ";
|
|
}
|
|
.section h4 {
|
|
counter-increment: subsubsection;
|
|
}
|
|
.section h4 a.toc-backref:before {
|
|
content: counter(section) "." counter(subsection) "." counter(subsubsection) " ";
|
|
}
|
|
</style>
|
|
|
|
.. role:: arc-term
|
|
.. role:: revision
|
|
.. role:: when-revised
|
|
|
|
==============================================
|
|
Objective-C Automatic Reference Counting (ARC)
|
|
==============================================
|
|
|
|
.. contents::
|
|
:local:
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.meta:
|
|
|
|
About this document
|
|
===================
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.meta.purpose:
|
|
|
|
Purpose
|
|
-------
|
|
|
|
The first and primary purpose of this document is to serve as a complete
|
|
technical specification of Automatic Reference Counting. Given a core
|
|
Objective-C compiler and runtime, it should be possible to write a compiler and
|
|
runtime which implements these new semantics.
|
|
|
|
The secondary purpose is to act as a rationale for why ARC was designed in this
|
|
way. This should remain tightly focused on the technical design and should not
|
|
stray into marketing speculation.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.meta.background:
|
|
|
|
Background
|
|
----------
|
|
|
|
This document assumes a basic familiarity with C.
|
|
|
|
:arc-term:`Blocks` are a C language extension for creating anonymous functions.
|
|
Users interact with and transfer block objects using :arc-term:`block
|
|
pointers`, which are represented like a normal pointer. A block may capture
|
|
values from local variables; when this occurs, memory must be dynamically
|
|
allocated. The initial allocation is done on the stack, but the runtime
|
|
provides a ``Block_copy`` function which, given a block pointer, either copies
|
|
the underlying block object to the heap, setting its reference count to 1 and
|
|
returning the new block pointer, or (if the block object is already on the
|
|
heap) increases its reference count by 1. The paired function is
|
|
``Block_release``, which decreases the reference count by 1 and destroys the
|
|
object if the count reaches zero and is on the heap.
|
|
|
|
Objective-C is a set of language extensions, significant enough to be
|
|
considered a different language. It is a strict superset of C. The extensions
|
|
can also be imposed on C++, producing a language called Objective-C++. The
|
|
primary feature is a single-inheritance object system; we briefly describe the
|
|
modern dialect.
|
|
|
|
Objective-C defines a new type kind, collectively called the :arc-term:`object
|
|
pointer types`. This kind has two notable builtin members, ``id`` and
|
|
``Class``; ``id`` is the final supertype of all object pointers. The validity
|
|
of conversions between object pointer types is not checked at runtime. Users
|
|
may define :arc-term:`classes`; each class is a type, and the pointer to that
|
|
type is an object pointer type. A class may have a superclass; its pointer
|
|
type is a subtype of its superclass's pointer type. A class has a set of
|
|
:arc-term:`ivars`, fields which appear on all instances of that class. For
|
|
every class *T* there's an associated metaclass; it has no fields, its
|
|
superclass is the metaclass of *T*'s superclass, and its metaclass is a global
|
|
class. Every class has a global object whose class is the class's metaclass;
|
|
metaclasses have no associated type, so pointers to this object have type
|
|
``Class``.
|
|
|
|
A class declaration (``@interface``) declares a set of :arc-term:`methods`. A
|
|
method has a return type, a list of argument types, and a :arc-term:`selector`:
|
|
a name like ``foo:bar:baz:``, where the number of colons corresponds to the
|
|
number of formal arguments. A method may be an instance method, in which case
|
|
it can be invoked on objects of the class, or a class method, in which case it
|
|
can be invoked on objects of the metaclass. A method may be invoked by
|
|
providing an object (called the :arc-term:`receiver`) and a list of formal
|
|
arguments interspersed with the selector, like so:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: objc
|
|
|
|
[receiver foo: fooArg bar: barArg baz: bazArg]
|
|
|
|
This looks in the dynamic class of the receiver for a method with this name,
|
|
then in that class's superclass, etc., until it finds something it can execute.
|
|
The receiver "expression" may also be the name of a class, in which case the
|
|
actual receiver is the class object for that class, or (within method
|
|
definitions) it may be ``super``, in which case the lookup algorithm starts
|
|
with the static superclass instead of the dynamic class. The actual methods
|
|
dynamically found in a class are not those declared in the ``@interface``, but
|
|
those defined in a separate ``@implementation`` declaration; however, when
|
|
compiling a call, typechecking is done based on the methods declared in the
|
|
``@interface``.
|
|
|
|
Method declarations may also be grouped into :arc-term:`protocols`, which are not
|
|
inherently associated with any class, but which classes may claim to follow.
|
|
Object pointer types may be qualified with additional protocols that the object
|
|
is known to support.
|
|
|
|
:arc-term:`Class extensions` are collections of ivars and methods, designed to
|
|
allow a class's ``@interface`` to be split across multiple files; however,
|
|
there is still a primary implementation file which must see the
|
|
``@interface``\ s of all class extensions. :arc-term:`Categories` allow
|
|
methods (but not ivars) to be declared *post hoc* on an arbitrary class; the
|
|
methods in the category's ``@implementation`` will be dynamically added to that
|
|
class's method tables which the category is loaded at runtime, replacing those
|
|
methods in case of a collision.
|
|
|
|
In the standard environment, objects are allocated on the heap, and their
|
|
lifetime is manually managed using a reference count. This is done using two
|
|
instance methods which all classes are expected to implement: ``retain``
|
|
increases the object's reference count by 1, whereas ``release`` decreases it
|
|
by 1 and calls the instance method ``dealloc`` if the count reaches 0. To
|
|
simplify certain operations, there is also an :arc-term:`autorelease pool`, a
|
|
thread-local list of objects to call ``release`` on later; an object can be
|
|
added to this pool by calling ``autorelease`` on it.
|
|
|
|
Block pointers may be converted to type ``id``; block objects are laid out in a
|
|
way that makes them compatible with Objective-C objects. There is a builtin
|
|
class that all block objects are considered to be objects of; this class
|
|
implements ``retain`` by adjusting the reference count, not by calling
|
|
``Block_copy``.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.meta.evolution:
|
|
|
|
Evolution
|
|
---------
|
|
|
|
ARC is under continual evolution, and this document must be updated as the
|
|
language progresses.
|
|
|
|
If a change increases the expressiveness of the language, for example by
|
|
lifting a restriction or by adding new syntax, the change will be annotated
|
|
with a revision marker, like so:
|
|
|
|
ARC applies to Objective-C pointer types, block pointer types, and
|
|
:when-revised:`[beginning Apple 8.0, LLVM 3.8]` :revision:`BPTRs declared
|
|
within` ``extern "BCPL"`` blocks.
|
|
|
|
For now, it is sensible to version this document by the releases of its sole
|
|
implementation (and its host project), clang. "LLVM X.Y" refers to an
|
|
open-source release of clang from the LLVM project. "Apple X.Y" refers to an
|
|
Apple-provided release of the Apple LLVM Compiler. Other organizations that
|
|
prepare their own, separately-versioned clang releases and wish to maintain
|
|
similar information in this document should send requests to cfe-dev.
|
|
|
|
If a change decreases the expressiveness of the language, for example by
|
|
imposing a new restriction, this should be taken as an oversight in the
|
|
original specification and something to be avoided in all versions. Such
|
|
changes are generally to be avoided.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.general:
|
|
|
|
General
|
|
=======
|
|
|
|
Automatic Reference Counting implements automatic memory management for
|
|
Objective-C objects and blocks, freeing the programmer from the need to
|
|
explicitly insert retains and releases. It does not provide a cycle collector;
|
|
users must explicitly manage the lifetime of their objects, breaking cycles
|
|
manually or with weak or unsafe references.
|
|
|
|
ARC may be explicitly enabled with the compiler flag ``-fobjc-arc``. It may
|
|
also be explicitly disabled with the compiler flag ``-fno-objc-arc``. The last
|
|
of these two flags appearing on the compile line "wins".
|
|
|
|
If ARC is enabled, ``__has_feature(objc_arc)`` will expand to 1 in the
|
|
preprocessor. For more information about ``__has_feature``, see the
|
|
:ref:`language extensions <langext-__has_feature-__has_extension>` document.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.objects:
|
|
|
|
Retainable object pointers
|
|
==========================
|
|
|
|
This section describes retainable object pointers, their basic operations, and
|
|
the restrictions imposed on their use under ARC. Note in particular that it
|
|
covers the rules for pointer *values* (patterns of bits indicating the location
|
|
of a pointed-to object), not pointer *objects* (locations in memory which store
|
|
pointer values). The rules for objects are covered in the next section.
|
|
|
|
A :arc-term:`retainable object pointer` (or "retainable pointer") is a value of
|
|
a :arc-term:`retainable object pointer type` ("retainable type"). There are
|
|
three kinds of retainable object pointer types:
|
|
|
|
* block pointers (formed by applying the caret (``^``) declarator sigil to a
|
|
function type)
|
|
* Objective-C object pointers (``id``, ``Class``, ``NSFoo*``, etc.)
|
|
* typedefs marked with ``__attribute__((NSObject))``
|
|
|
|
Other pointer types, such as ``int*`` and ``CFStringRef``, are not subject to
|
|
ARC's semantics and restrictions.
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Rationale
|
|
|
|
We are not at liberty to require all code to be recompiled with ARC;
|
|
therefore, ARC must interoperate with Objective-C code which manages retains
|
|
and releases manually. In general, there are three requirements in order for
|
|
a compiler-supported reference-count system to provide reliable
|
|
interoperation:
|
|
|
|
* The type system must reliably identify which objects are to be managed. An
|
|
``int*`` might be a pointer to a ``malloc``'ed array, or it might be an
|
|
interior pointer to such an array, or it might point to some field or local
|
|
variable. In contrast, values of the retainable object pointer types are
|
|
never interior.
|
|
|
|
* The type system must reliably indicate how to manage objects of a type.
|
|
This usually means that the type must imply a procedure for incrementing
|
|
and decrementing retain counts. Supporting single-ownership objects
|
|
requires a lot more explicit mediation in the language.
|
|
|
|
* There must be reliable conventions for whether and when "ownership" is
|
|
passed between caller and callee, for both arguments and return values.
|
|
Objective-C methods follow such a convention very reliably, at least for
|
|
system libraries on Mac OS X, and functions always pass objects at +0. The
|
|
C-based APIs for Core Foundation objects, on the other hand, have much more
|
|
varied transfer semantics.
|
|
|
|
The use of ``__attribute__((NSObject))`` typedefs is not recommended. If it's
|
|
absolutely necessary to use this attribute, be very explicit about using the
|
|
typedef, and do not assume that it will be preserved by language features like
|
|
``__typeof`` and C++ template argument substitution.
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Rationale
|
|
|
|
Any compiler operation which incidentally strips type "sugar" from a type
|
|
will yield a type without the attribute, which may result in unexpected
|
|
behavior.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.objects.retains:
|
|
|
|
Retain count semantics
|
|
----------------------
|
|
|
|
A retainable object pointer is either a :arc-term:`null pointer` or a pointer
|
|
to a valid object. Furthermore, if it has block pointer type and is not
|
|
``null`` then it must actually be a pointer to a block object, and if it has
|
|
``Class`` type (possibly protocol-qualified) then it must actually be a pointer
|
|
to a class object. Otherwise ARC does not enforce the Objective-C type system
|
|
as long as the implementing methods follow the signature of the static type.
|
|
It is undefined behavior if ARC is exposed to an invalid pointer.
|
|
|
|
For ARC's purposes, a valid object is one with "well-behaved" retaining
|
|
operations. Specifically, the object must be laid out such that the
|
|
Objective-C message send machinery can successfully send it the following
|
|
messages:
|
|
|
|
* ``retain``, taking no arguments and returning a pointer to the object.
|
|
* ``release``, taking no arguments and returning ``void``.
|
|
* ``autorelease``, taking no arguments and returning a pointer to the object.
|
|
|
|
The behavior of these methods is constrained in the following ways. The term
|
|
:arc-term:`high-level semantics` is an intentionally vague term; the intent is
|
|
that programmers must implement these methods in a way such that the compiler,
|
|
modifying code in ways it deems safe according to these constraints, will not
|
|
violate their requirements. For example, if the user puts logging statements
|
|
in ``retain``, they should not be surprised if those statements are executed
|
|
more or less often depending on optimization settings. These constraints are
|
|
not exhaustive of the optimization opportunities: values held in local
|
|
variables are subject to additional restrictions, described later in this
|
|
document.
|
|
|
|
It is undefined behavior if a computation history featuring a send of
|
|
``retain`` followed by a send of ``release`` to the same object, with no
|
|
intervening ``release`` on that object, is not equivalent under the high-level
|
|
semantics to a computation history in which these sends are removed. Note that
|
|
this implies that these methods may not raise exceptions.
|
|
|
|
It is undefined behavior if a computation history features any use whatsoever
|
|
of an object following the completion of a send of ``release`` that is not
|
|
preceded by a send of ``retain`` to the same object.
|
|
|
|
The behavior of ``autorelease`` must be equivalent to sending ``release`` when
|
|
one of the autorelease pools currently in scope is popped. It may not throw an
|
|
exception.
|
|
|
|
When the semantics call for performing one of these operations on a retainable
|
|
object pointer, if that pointer is ``null`` then the effect is a no-op.
|
|
|
|
All of the semantics described in this document are subject to additional
|
|
:ref:`optimization rules <arc.optimization>` which permit the removal or
|
|
optimization of operations based on local knowledge of data flow. The
|
|
semantics describe the high-level behaviors that the compiler implements, not
|
|
an exact sequence of operations that a program will be compiled into.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.objects.operands:
|
|
|
|
Retainable object pointers as operands and arguments
|
|
----------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
In general, ARC does not perform retain or release operations when simply using
|
|
a retainable object pointer as an operand within an expression. This includes:
|
|
|
|
* loading a retainable pointer from an object with non-weak :ref:`ownership
|
|
<arc.ownership>`,
|
|
* passing a retainable pointer as an argument to a function or method, and
|
|
* receiving a retainable pointer as the result of a function or method call.
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Rationale
|
|
|
|
While this might seem uncontroversial, it is actually unsafe when multiple
|
|
expressions are evaluated in "parallel", as with binary operators and calls,
|
|
because (for example) one expression might load from an object while another
|
|
writes to it. However, C and C++ already call this undefined behavior
|
|
because the evaluations are unsequenced, and ARC simply exploits that here to
|
|
avoid needing to retain arguments across a large number of calls.
|
|
|
|
The remainder of this section describes exceptions to these rules, how those
|
|
exceptions are detected, and what those exceptions imply semantically.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.objects.operands.consumed:
|
|
|
|
Consumed parameters
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
A function or method parameter of retainable object pointer type may be marked
|
|
as :arc-term:`consumed`, signifying that the callee expects to take ownership
|
|
of a +1 retain count. This is done by adding the ``ns_consumed`` attribute to
|
|
the parameter declaration, like so:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: objc
|
|
|
|
void foo(__attribute((ns_consumed)) id x);
|
|
- (void) foo: (id) __attribute((ns_consumed)) x;
|
|
|
|
This attribute is part of the type of the function or method, not the type of
|
|
the parameter. It controls only how the argument is passed and received.
|
|
|
|
When passing such an argument, ARC retains the argument prior to making the
|
|
call.
|
|
|
|
When receiving such an argument, ARC releases the argument at the end of the
|
|
function, subject to the usual optimizations for local values.
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Rationale
|
|
|
|
This formalizes direct transfers of ownership from a caller to a callee. The
|
|
most common scenario here is passing the ``self`` parameter to ``init``, but
|
|
it is useful to generalize. Typically, local optimization will remove any
|
|
extra retains and releases: on the caller side the retain will be merged with
|
|
a +1 source, and on the callee side the release will be rolled into the
|
|
initialization of the parameter.
|
|
|
|
The implicit ``self`` parameter of a method may be marked as consumed by adding
|
|
``__attribute__((ns_consumes_self))`` to the method declaration. Methods in
|
|
the ``init`` :ref:`family <arc.method-families>` are treated as if they were
|
|
implicitly marked with this attribute.
|
|
|
|
It is undefined behavior if an Objective-C message send to a method with
|
|
``ns_consumed`` parameters (other than self) is made with a null receiver. It
|
|
is undefined behavior if the method to which an Objective-C message send
|
|
statically resolves to has a different set of ``ns_consumed`` parameters than
|
|
the method it dynamically resolves to. It is undefined behavior if a block or
|
|
function call is made through a static type with a different set of
|
|
``ns_consumed`` parameters than the implementation of the called block or
|
|
function.
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Rationale
|
|
|
|
Consumed parameters with null receiver are a guaranteed leak. Mismatches
|
|
with consumed parameters will cause over-retains or over-releases, depending
|
|
on the direction. The rule about function calls is really just an
|
|
application of the existing C/C++ rule about calling functions through an
|
|
incompatible function type, but it's useful to state it explicitly.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.object.operands.retained-return-values:
|
|
|
|
Retained return values
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
A function or method which returns a retainable object pointer type may be
|
|
marked as returning a retained value, signifying that the caller expects to take
|
|
ownership of a +1 retain count. This is done by adding the
|
|
``ns_returns_retained`` attribute to the function or method declaration, like
|
|
so:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: objc
|
|
|
|
id foo(void) __attribute((ns_returns_retained));
|
|
- (id) foo __attribute((ns_returns_retained));
|
|
|
|
This attribute is part of the type of the function or method.
|
|
|
|
When returning from such a function or method, ARC retains the value at the
|
|
point of evaluation of the return statement, before leaving all local scopes.
|
|
|
|
When receiving a return result from such a function or method, ARC releases the
|
|
value at the end of the full-expression it is contained within, subject to the
|
|
usual optimizations for local values.
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Rationale
|
|
|
|
This formalizes direct transfers of ownership from a callee to a caller. The
|
|
most common scenario this models is the retained return from ``init``,
|
|
``alloc``, ``new``, and ``copy`` methods, but there are other cases in the
|
|
frameworks. After optimization there are typically no extra retains and
|
|
releases required.
|
|
|
|
Methods in the ``alloc``, ``copy``, ``init``, ``mutableCopy``, and ``new``
|
|
:ref:`families <arc.method-families>` are implicitly marked
|
|
``__attribute__((ns_returns_retained))``. This may be suppressed by explicitly
|
|
marking the method ``__attribute__((ns_returns_not_retained))``.
|
|
|
|
It is undefined behavior if the method to which an Objective-C message send
|
|
statically resolves has different retain semantics on its result from the
|
|
method it dynamically resolves to. It is undefined behavior if a block or
|
|
function call is made through a static type with different retain semantics on
|
|
its result from the implementation of the called block or function.
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Rationale
|
|
|
|
Mismatches with returned results will cause over-retains or over-releases,
|
|
depending on the direction. Again, the rule about function calls is really
|
|
just an application of the existing C/C++ rule about calling functions
|
|
through an incompatible function type.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.objects.operands.unretained-returns:
|
|
|
|
Unretained return values
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
A method or function which returns a retainable object type but does not return
|
|
a retained value must ensure that the object is still valid across the return
|
|
boundary.
|
|
|
|
When returning from such a function or method, ARC retains the value at the
|
|
point of evaluation of the return statement, then leaves all local scopes, and
|
|
then balances out the retain while ensuring that the value lives across the
|
|
call boundary. In the worst case, this may involve an ``autorelease``, but
|
|
callers must not assume that the value is actually in the autorelease pool.
|
|
|
|
ARC performs no extra mandatory work on the caller side, although it may elect
|
|
to do something to shorten the lifetime of the returned value.
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Rationale
|
|
|
|
It is common in non-ARC code to not return an autoreleased value; therefore
|
|
the convention does not force either path. It is convenient to not be
|
|
required to do unnecessary retains and autoreleases; this permits
|
|
optimizations such as eliding retain/autoreleases when it can be shown that
|
|
the original pointer will still be valid at the point of return.
|
|
|
|
A method or function may be marked with
|
|
``__attribute__((ns_returns_autoreleased))`` to indicate that it returns a
|
|
pointer which is guaranteed to be valid at least as long as the innermost
|
|
autorelease pool. There are no additional semantics enforced in the definition
|
|
of such a method; it merely enables optimizations in callers.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.objects.operands.casts:
|
|
|
|
Bridged casts
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
A :arc-term:`bridged cast` is a C-style cast annotated with one of three
|
|
keywords:
|
|
|
|
* ``(__bridge T) op`` casts the operand to the destination type ``T``. If
|
|
``T`` is a retainable object pointer type, then ``op`` must have a
|
|
non-retainable pointer type. If ``T`` is a non-retainable pointer type,
|
|
then ``op`` must have a retainable object pointer type. Otherwise the cast
|
|
is ill-formed. There is no transfer of ownership, and ARC inserts no retain
|
|
operations.
|
|
* ``(__bridge_retained T) op`` casts the operand, which must have retainable
|
|
object pointer type, to the destination type, which must be a non-retainable
|
|
pointer type. ARC retains the value, subject to the usual optimizations on
|
|
local values, and the recipient is responsible for balancing that +1.
|
|
* ``(__bridge_transfer T) op`` casts the operand, which must have
|
|
non-retainable pointer type, to the destination type, which must be a
|
|
retainable object pointer type. ARC will release the value at the end of
|
|
the enclosing full-expression, subject to the usual optimizations on local
|
|
values.
|
|
|
|
These casts are required in order to transfer objects in and out of ARC
|
|
control; see the rationale in the section on :ref:`conversion of retainable
|
|
object pointers <arc.objects.restrictions.conversion>`.
|
|
|
|
Using a ``__bridge_retained`` or ``__bridge_transfer`` cast purely to convince
|
|
ARC to emit an unbalanced retain or release, respectively, is poor form.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.objects.restrictions:
|
|
|
|
Restrictions
|
|
------------
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.objects.restrictions.conversion:
|
|
|
|
Conversion of retainable object pointers
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
In general, a program which attempts to implicitly or explicitly convert a
|
|
value of retainable object pointer type to any non-retainable type, or
|
|
vice-versa, is ill-formed. For example, an Objective-C object pointer shall
|
|
not be converted to ``void*``. As an exception, cast to ``intptr_t`` is
|
|
allowed because such casts are not transferring ownership. The :ref:`bridged
|
|
casts <arc.objects.operands.casts>` may be used to perform these conversions
|
|
where necessary.
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Rationale
|
|
|
|
We cannot ensure the correct management of the lifetime of objects if they
|
|
may be freely passed around as unmanaged types. The bridged casts are
|
|
provided so that the programmer may explicitly describe whether the cast
|
|
transfers control into or out of ARC.
|
|
|
|
However, the following exceptions apply.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.objects.restrictions.conversion.with.known.semantics:
|
|
|
|
Conversion to retainable object pointer type of expressions with known semantics
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
:when-revised:`[beginning Apple 4.0, LLVM 3.1]`
|
|
:revision:`These exceptions have been greatly expanded; they previously applied
|
|
only to a much-reduced subset which is difficult to categorize but which
|
|
included null pointers, message sends (under the given rules), and the various
|
|
global constants.`
|
|
|
|
An unbridged conversion to a retainable object pointer type from a type other
|
|
than a retainable object pointer type is ill-formed, as discussed above, unless
|
|
the operand of the cast has a syntactic form which is known retained, known
|
|
unretained, or known retain-agnostic.
|
|
|
|
An expression is :arc-term:`known retain-agnostic` if it is:
|
|
|
|
* an Objective-C string literal,
|
|
* a load from a ``const`` system global variable of :ref:`C retainable pointer
|
|
type <arc.misc.c-retainable>`, or
|
|
* a null pointer constant.
|
|
|
|
An expression is :arc-term:`known unretained` if it is an rvalue of :ref:`C
|
|
retainable pointer type <arc.misc.c-retainable>` and it is:
|
|
|
|
* a direct call to a function, and either that function has the
|
|
``cf_returns_not_retained`` attribute or it is an :ref:`audited
|
|
<arc.misc.c-retainable.audit>` function that does not have the
|
|
``cf_returns_retained`` attribute and does not follow the create/copy naming
|
|
convention,
|
|
* a message send, and the declared method either has the
|
|
``cf_returns_not_retained`` attribute or it has neither the
|
|
``cf_returns_retained`` attribute nor a :ref:`selector family
|
|
<arc.method-families>` that implies a retained result, or
|
|
* :when-revised:`[beginning LLVM 3.6]` :revision:`a load from a` ``const``
|
|
:revision:`non-system global variable.`
|
|
|
|
An expression is :arc-term:`known retained` if it is an rvalue of :ref:`C
|
|
retainable pointer type <arc.misc.c-retainable>` and it is:
|
|
|
|
* a message send, and the declared method either has the
|
|
``cf_returns_retained`` attribute, or it does not have the
|
|
``cf_returns_not_retained`` attribute but it does have a :ref:`selector
|
|
family <arc.method-families>` that implies a retained result.
|
|
|
|
Furthermore:
|
|
|
|
* a comma expression is classified according to its right-hand side,
|
|
* a statement expression is classified according to its result expression, if
|
|
it has one,
|
|
* an lvalue-to-rvalue conversion applied to an Objective-C property lvalue is
|
|
classified according to the underlying message send, and
|
|
* a conditional operator is classified according to its second and third
|
|
operands, if they agree in classification, or else the other if one is known
|
|
retain-agnostic.
|
|
|
|
If the cast operand is known retained, the conversion is treated as a
|
|
``__bridge_transfer`` cast. If the cast operand is known unretained or known
|
|
retain-agnostic, the conversion is treated as a ``__bridge`` cast.
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Rationale
|
|
|
|
Bridging casts are annoying. Absent the ability to completely automate the
|
|
management of CF objects, however, we are left with relatively poor attempts
|
|
to reduce the need for a glut of explicit bridges. Hence these rules.
|
|
|
|
We've so far consciously refrained from implicitly turning retained CF
|
|
results from function calls into ``__bridge_transfer`` casts. The worry is
|
|
that some code patterns --- for example, creating a CF value, assigning it
|
|
to an ObjC-typed local, and then calling ``CFRelease`` when done --- are a
|
|
bit too likely to be accidentally accepted, leading to mysterious behavior.
|
|
|
|
For loads from ``const`` global variables of :ref:`C retainable pointer type
|
|
<arc.misc.c-retainable>`, it is reasonable to assume that global system
|
|
constants were initialitzed with true constants (e.g. string literals), but
|
|
user constants might have been initialized with something dynamically
|
|
allocated, using a global initializer.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.objects.restrictions.conversion-exception-contextual:
|
|
|
|
Conversion from retainable object pointer type in certain contexts
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
:when-revised:`[beginning Apple 4.0, LLVM 3.1]`
|
|
|
|
If an expression of retainable object pointer type is explicitly cast to a
|
|
:ref:`C retainable pointer type <arc.misc.c-retainable>`, the program is
|
|
ill-formed as discussed above unless the result is immediately used:
|
|
|
|
* to initialize a parameter in an Objective-C message send where the parameter
|
|
is not marked with the ``cf_consumed`` attribute, or
|
|
* to initialize a parameter in a direct call to an
|
|
:ref:`audited <arc.misc.c-retainable.audit>` function where the parameter is
|
|
not marked with the ``cf_consumed`` attribute.
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Rationale
|
|
|
|
Consumed parameters are left out because ARC would naturally balance them
|
|
with a retain, which was judged too treacherous. This is in part because
|
|
several of the most common consuming functions are in the ``Release`` family,
|
|
and it would be quite unfortunate for explicit releases to be silently
|
|
balanced out in this way.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.ownership:
|
|
|
|
Ownership qualification
|
|
=======================
|
|
|
|
This section describes the behavior of *objects* of retainable object pointer
|
|
type; that is, locations in memory which store retainable object pointers.
|
|
|
|
A type is a :arc-term:`retainable object owner type` if it is a retainable
|
|
object pointer type or an array type whose element type is a retainable object
|
|
owner type.
|
|
|
|
An :arc-term:`ownership qualifier` is a type qualifier which applies only to
|
|
retainable object owner types. An array type is ownership-qualified according
|
|
to its element type, and adding an ownership qualifier to an array type so
|
|
qualifies its element type.
|
|
|
|
A program is ill-formed if it attempts to apply an ownership qualifier to a
|
|
type which is already ownership-qualified, even if it is the same qualifier.
|
|
There is a single exception to this rule: an ownership qualifier may be applied
|
|
to a substituted template type parameter, which overrides the ownership
|
|
qualifier provided by the template argument.
|
|
|
|
When forming a function type, the result type is adjusted so that any
|
|
top-level ownership qualifier is deleted.
|
|
|
|
Except as described under the :ref:`inference rules <arc.ownership.inference>`,
|
|
a program is ill-formed if it attempts to form a pointer or reference type to a
|
|
retainable object owner type which lacks an ownership qualifier.
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Rationale
|
|
|
|
These rules, together with the inference rules, ensure that all objects and
|
|
lvalues of retainable object pointer type have an ownership qualifier. The
|
|
ability to override an ownership qualifier during template substitution is
|
|
required to counteract the :ref:`inference of __strong for template type
|
|
arguments <arc.ownership.inference.template.arguments>`. Ownership qualifiers
|
|
on return types are dropped because they serve no purpose there except to
|
|
cause spurious problems with overloading and templates.
|
|
|
|
There are four ownership qualifiers:
|
|
|
|
* ``__autoreleasing``
|
|
* ``__strong``
|
|
* ``__unsafe_unretained``
|
|
* ``__weak``
|
|
|
|
A type is :arc-term:`nontrivially ownership-qualified` if it is qualified with
|
|
``__autoreleasing``, ``__strong``, or ``__weak``.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.ownership.spelling:
|
|
|
|
Spelling
|
|
--------
|
|
|
|
The names of the ownership qualifiers are reserved for the implementation. A
|
|
program may not assume that they are or are not implemented with macros, or
|
|
what those macros expand to.
|
|
|
|
An ownership qualifier may be written anywhere that any other type qualifier
|
|
may be written.
|
|
|
|
If an ownership qualifier appears in the *declaration-specifiers*, the
|
|
following rules apply:
|
|
|
|
* if the type specifier is a retainable object owner type, the qualifier
|
|
initially applies to that type;
|
|
|
|
* otherwise, if the outermost non-array declarator is a pointer
|
|
or block pointer declarator, the qualifier initially applies to
|
|
that type;
|
|
|
|
* otherwise the program is ill-formed.
|
|
|
|
* If the qualifier is so applied at a position in the declaration
|
|
where the next-innermost declarator is a function declarator, and
|
|
there is an block declarator within that function declarator, then
|
|
the qualifier applies instead to that block declarator and this rule
|
|
is considered afresh beginning from the new position.
|
|
|
|
If an ownership qualifier appears on the declarator name, or on the declared
|
|
object, it is applied to the innermost pointer or block-pointer type.
|
|
|
|
If an ownership qualifier appears anywhere else in a declarator, it applies to
|
|
the type there.
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Rationale
|
|
|
|
Ownership qualifiers are like ``const`` and ``volatile`` in the sense
|
|
that they may sensibly apply at multiple distinct positions within a
|
|
declarator. However, unlike those qualifiers, there are many
|
|
situations where they are not meaningful, and so we make an effort
|
|
to "move" the qualifier to a place where it will be meaningful. The
|
|
general goal is to allow the programmer to write, say, ``__strong``
|
|
before the entire declaration and have it apply in the leftmost
|
|
sensible place.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.ownership.spelling.property:
|
|
|
|
Property declarations
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
A property of retainable object pointer type may have ownership. If the
|
|
property's type is ownership-qualified, then the property has that ownership.
|
|
If the property has one of the following modifiers, then the property has the
|
|
corresponding ownership. A property is ill-formed if it has conflicting
|
|
sources of ownership, or if it has redundant ownership modifiers, or if it has
|
|
``__autoreleasing`` ownership.
|
|
|
|
* ``assign`` implies ``__unsafe_unretained`` ownership.
|
|
* ``copy`` implies ``__strong`` ownership, as well as the usual behavior of
|
|
copy semantics on the setter.
|
|
* ``retain`` implies ``__strong`` ownership.
|
|
* ``strong`` implies ``__strong`` ownership.
|
|
* ``unsafe_unretained`` implies ``__unsafe_unretained`` ownership.
|
|
* ``weak`` implies ``__weak`` ownership.
|
|
|
|
With the exception of ``weak``, these modifiers are available in non-ARC
|
|
modes.
|
|
|
|
A property's specified ownership is preserved in its metadata, but otherwise
|
|
the meaning is purely conventional unless the property is synthesized. If a
|
|
property is synthesized, then the :arc-term:`associated instance variable` is
|
|
the instance variable which is named, possibly implicitly, by the
|
|
``@synthesize`` declaration. If the associated instance variable already
|
|
exists, then its ownership qualification must equal the ownership of the
|
|
property; otherwise, the instance variable is created with that ownership
|
|
qualification.
|
|
|
|
A property of retainable object pointer type which is synthesized without a
|
|
source of ownership has the ownership of its associated instance variable, if it
|
|
already exists; otherwise, :when-revised:`[beginning Apple 3.1, LLVM 3.1]`
|
|
:revision:`its ownership is implicitly` ``strong``. Prior to this revision, it
|
|
was ill-formed to synthesize such a property.
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Rationale
|
|
|
|
Using ``strong`` by default is safe and consistent with the generic ARC rule
|
|
about :ref:`inferring ownership <arc.ownership.inference.variables>`. It is,
|
|
unfortunately, inconsistent with the non-ARC rule which states that such
|
|
properties are implicitly ``assign``. However, that rule is clearly
|
|
untenable in ARC, since it leads to default-unsafe code. The main merit to
|
|
banning the properties is to avoid confusion with non-ARC practice, which did
|
|
not ultimately strike us as sufficient to justify requiring extra syntax and
|
|
(more importantly) forcing novices to understand ownership rules just to
|
|
declare a property when the default is so reasonable. Changing the rule away
|
|
from non-ARC practice was acceptable because we had conservatively banned the
|
|
synthesis in order to give ourselves exactly this leeway.
|
|
|
|
Applying ``__attribute__((NSObject))`` to a property not of retainable object
|
|
pointer type has the same behavior it does outside of ARC: it requires the
|
|
property type to be some sort of pointer and permits the use of modifiers other
|
|
than ``assign``. These modifiers only affect the synthesized getter and
|
|
setter; direct accesses to the ivar (even if synthesized) still have primitive
|
|
semantics, and the value in the ivar will not be automatically released during
|
|
deallocation.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.ownership.semantics:
|
|
|
|
Semantics
|
|
---------
|
|
|
|
There are five :arc-term:`managed operations` which may be performed on an
|
|
object of retainable object pointer type. Each qualifier specifies different
|
|
semantics for each of these operations. It is still undefined behavior to
|
|
access an object outside of its lifetime.
|
|
|
|
A load or store with "primitive semantics" has the same semantics as the
|
|
respective operation would have on an ``void*`` lvalue with the same alignment
|
|
and non-ownership qualification.
|
|
|
|
:arc-term:`Reading` occurs when performing a lvalue-to-rvalue conversion on an
|
|
object lvalue.
|
|
|
|
* For ``__weak`` objects, the current pointee is retained and then released at
|
|
the end of the current full-expression. This must execute atomically with
|
|
respect to assignments and to the final release of the pointee.
|
|
* For all other objects, the lvalue is loaded with primitive semantics.
|
|
|
|
:arc-term:`Assignment` occurs when evaluating an assignment operator. The
|
|
semantics vary based on the qualification:
|
|
|
|
* For ``__strong`` objects, the new pointee is first retained; second, the
|
|
lvalue is loaded with primitive semantics; third, the new pointee is stored
|
|
into the lvalue with primitive semantics; and finally, the old pointee is
|
|
released. This is not performed atomically; external synchronization must be
|
|
used to make this safe in the face of concurrent loads and stores.
|
|
* For ``__weak`` objects, the lvalue is updated to point to the new pointee,
|
|
unless the new pointee is an object currently undergoing deallocation, in
|
|
which case the lvalue is updated to a null pointer. This must execute
|
|
atomically with respect to other assignments to the object, to reads from the
|
|
object, and to the final release of the new pointee.
|
|
* For ``__unsafe_unretained`` objects, the new pointee is stored into the
|
|
lvalue using primitive semantics.
|
|
* For ``__autoreleasing`` objects, the new pointee is retained, autoreleased,
|
|
and stored into the lvalue using primitive semantics.
|
|
|
|
:arc-term:`Initialization` occurs when an object's lifetime begins, which
|
|
depends on its storage duration. Initialization proceeds in two stages:
|
|
|
|
#. First, a null pointer is stored into the lvalue using primitive semantics.
|
|
This step is skipped if the object is ``__unsafe_unretained``.
|
|
#. Second, if the object has an initializer, that expression is evaluated and
|
|
then assigned into the object using the usual assignment semantics.
|
|
|
|
:arc-term:`Destruction` occurs when an object's lifetime ends. In all cases it
|
|
is semantically equivalent to assigning a null pointer to the object, with the
|
|
proviso that of course the object cannot be legally read after the object's
|
|
lifetime ends.
|
|
|
|
:arc-term:`Moving` occurs in specific situations where an lvalue is "moved
|
|
from", meaning that its current pointee will be used but the object may be left
|
|
in a different (but still valid) state. This arises with ``__block`` variables
|
|
and rvalue references in C++. For ``__strong`` lvalues, moving is equivalent
|
|
to loading the lvalue with primitive semantics, writing a null pointer to it
|
|
with primitive semantics, and then releasing the result of the load at the end
|
|
of the current full-expression. For all other lvalues, moving is equivalent to
|
|
reading the object.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.ownership.restrictions:
|
|
|
|
Restrictions
|
|
------------
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.ownership.restrictions.weak:
|
|
|
|
Weak-unavailable types
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
It is explicitly permitted for Objective-C classes to not support ``__weak``
|
|
references. It is undefined behavior to perform an operation with weak
|
|
assignment semantics with a pointer to an Objective-C object whose class does
|
|
not support ``__weak`` references.
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Rationale
|
|
|
|
Historically, it has been possible for a class to provide its own
|
|
reference-count implementation by overriding ``retain``, ``release``, etc.
|
|
However, weak references to an object require coordination with its class's
|
|
reference-count implementation because, among other things, weak loads and
|
|
stores must be atomic with respect to the final release. Therefore, existing
|
|
custom reference-count implementations will generally not support weak
|
|
references without additional effort. This is unavoidable without breaking
|
|
binary compatibility.
|
|
|
|
A class may indicate that it does not support weak references by providing the
|
|
``objc_arc_weak_unavailable`` attribute on the class's interface declaration. A
|
|
retainable object pointer type is **weak-unavailable** if
|
|
is a pointer to an (optionally protocol-qualified) Objective-C class ``T`` where
|
|
``T`` or one of its superclasses has the ``objc_arc_weak_unavailable``
|
|
attribute. A program is ill-formed if it applies the ``__weak`` ownership
|
|
qualifier to a weak-unavailable type or if the value operand of a weak
|
|
assignment operation has a weak-unavailable type.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.ownership.restrictions.autoreleasing:
|
|
|
|
Storage duration of ``__autoreleasing`` objects
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
A program is ill-formed if it declares an ``__autoreleasing`` object of
|
|
non-automatic storage duration. A program is ill-formed if it captures an
|
|
``__autoreleasing`` object in a block or, unless by reference, in a C++11
|
|
lambda.
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Rationale
|
|
|
|
Autorelease pools are tied to the current thread and scope by their nature.
|
|
While it is possible to have temporary objects whose instance variables are
|
|
filled with autoreleased objects, there is no way that ARC can provide any
|
|
sort of safety guarantee there.
|
|
|
|
It is undefined behavior if a non-null pointer is assigned to an
|
|
``__autoreleasing`` object while an autorelease pool is in scope and then that
|
|
object is read after the autorelease pool's scope is left.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.ownership.restrictions.conversion.indirect:
|
|
|
|
Conversion of pointers to ownership-qualified types
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
A program is ill-formed if an expression of type ``T*`` is converted,
|
|
explicitly or implicitly, to the type ``U*``, where ``T`` and ``U`` have
|
|
different ownership qualification, unless:
|
|
|
|
* ``T`` is qualified with ``__strong``, ``__autoreleasing``, or
|
|
``__unsafe_unretained``, and ``U`` is qualified with both ``const`` and
|
|
``__unsafe_unretained``; or
|
|
* either ``T`` or ``U`` is ``cv void``, where ``cv`` is an optional sequence
|
|
of non-ownership qualifiers; or
|
|
* the conversion is requested with a ``reinterpret_cast`` in Objective-C++; or
|
|
* the conversion is a well-formed :ref:`pass-by-writeback
|
|
<arc.ownership.restrictions.pass_by_writeback>`.
|
|
|
|
The analogous rule applies to ``T&`` and ``U&`` in Objective-C++.
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Rationale
|
|
|
|
These rules provide a reasonable level of type-safety for indirect pointers,
|
|
as long as the underlying memory is not deallocated. The conversion to
|
|
``const __unsafe_unretained`` is permitted because the semantics of reads are
|
|
equivalent across all these ownership semantics, and that's a very useful and
|
|
common pattern. The interconversion with ``void*`` is useful for allocating
|
|
memory or otherwise escaping the type system, but use it carefully.
|
|
``reinterpret_cast`` is considered to be an obvious enough sign of taking
|
|
responsibility for any problems.
|
|
|
|
It is undefined behavior to access an ownership-qualified object through an
|
|
lvalue of a differently-qualified type, except that any non-``__weak`` object
|
|
may be read through an ``__unsafe_unretained`` lvalue.
|
|
|
|
It is undefined behavior if a managed operation is performed on a ``__strong``
|
|
or ``__weak`` object without a guarantee that it contains a primitive zero
|
|
bit-pattern, or if the storage for such an object is freed or reused without the
|
|
object being first assigned a null pointer.
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Rationale
|
|
|
|
ARC cannot differentiate between an assignment operator which is intended to
|
|
"initialize" dynamic memory and one which is intended to potentially replace
|
|
a value. Therefore the object's pointer must be valid before letting ARC at
|
|
it. Similarly, C and Objective-C do not provide any language hooks for
|
|
destroying objects held in dynamic memory, so it is the programmer's
|
|
responsibility to avoid leaks (``__strong`` objects) and consistency errors
|
|
(``__weak`` objects).
|
|
|
|
These requirements are followed automatically in Objective-C++ when creating
|
|
objects of retainable object owner type with ``new`` or ``new[]`` and destroying
|
|
them with ``delete``, ``delete[]``, or a pseudo-destructor expression. Note
|
|
that arrays of nontrivially-ownership-qualified type are not ABI compatible with
|
|
non-ARC code because the element type is non-POD: such arrays that are
|
|
``new[]``'d in ARC translation units cannot be ``delete[]``'d in non-ARC
|
|
translation units and vice-versa.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.ownership.restrictions.pass_by_writeback:
|
|
|
|
Passing to an out parameter by writeback
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
If the argument passed to a parameter of type ``T __autoreleasing *`` has type
|
|
``U oq *``, where ``oq`` is an ownership qualifier, then the argument is a
|
|
candidate for :arc-term:`pass-by-writeback`` if:
|
|
|
|
* ``oq`` is ``__strong`` or ``__weak``, and
|
|
* it would be legal to initialize a ``T __strong *`` with a ``U __strong *``.
|
|
|
|
For purposes of overload resolution, an implicit conversion sequence requiring
|
|
a pass-by-writeback is always worse than an implicit conversion sequence not
|
|
requiring a pass-by-writeback.
|
|
|
|
The pass-by-writeback is ill-formed if the argument expression does not have a
|
|
legal form:
|
|
|
|
* ``&var``, where ``var`` is a scalar variable of automatic storage duration
|
|
with retainable object pointer type
|
|
* a conditional expression where the second and third operands are both legal
|
|
forms
|
|
* a cast whose operand is a legal form
|
|
* a null pointer constant
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Rationale
|
|
|
|
The restriction in the form of the argument serves two purposes. First, it
|
|
makes it impossible to pass the address of an array to the argument, which
|
|
serves to protect against an otherwise serious risk of mis-inferring an
|
|
"array" argument as an out-parameter. Second, it makes it much less likely
|
|
that the user will see confusing aliasing problems due to the implementation,
|
|
below, where their store to the writeback temporary is not immediately seen
|
|
in the original argument variable.
|
|
|
|
A pass-by-writeback is evaluated as follows:
|
|
|
|
#. The argument is evaluated to yield a pointer ``p`` of type ``U oq *``.
|
|
#. If ``p`` is a null pointer, then a null pointer is passed as the argument,
|
|
and no further work is required for the pass-by-writeback.
|
|
#. Otherwise, a temporary of type ``T __autoreleasing`` is created and
|
|
initialized to a null pointer.
|
|
#. If the parameter is not an Objective-C method parameter marked ``out``,
|
|
then ``*p`` is read, and the result is written into the temporary with
|
|
primitive semantics.
|
|
#. The address of the temporary is passed as the argument to the actual call.
|
|
#. After the call completes, the temporary is loaded with primitive
|
|
semantics, and that value is assigned into ``*p``.
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Rationale
|
|
|
|
This is all admittedly convoluted. In an ideal world, we would see that a
|
|
local variable is being passed to an out-parameter and retroactively modify
|
|
its type to be ``__autoreleasing`` rather than ``__strong``. This would be
|
|
remarkably difficult and not always well-founded under the C type system.
|
|
However, it was judged unacceptably invasive to require programmers to write
|
|
``__autoreleasing`` on all the variables they intend to use for
|
|
out-parameters. This was the least bad solution.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.ownership.restrictions.records:
|
|
|
|
Ownership-qualified fields of structs and unions
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
A program is ill-formed if it declares a member of a C struct or union to have
|
|
a nontrivially ownership-qualified type.
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Rationale
|
|
|
|
The resulting type would be non-POD in the C++ sense, but C does not give us
|
|
very good language tools for managing the lifetime of aggregates, so it is
|
|
more convenient to simply forbid them. It is still possible to manage this
|
|
with a ``void*`` or an ``__unsafe_unretained`` object.
|
|
|
|
This restriction does not apply in Objective-C++. However, nontrivally
|
|
ownership-qualified types are considered non-POD: in C++11 terms, they are not
|
|
trivially default constructible, copy constructible, move constructible, copy
|
|
assignable, move assignable, or destructible. It is a violation of C++'s One
|
|
Definition Rule to use a class outside of ARC that, under ARC, would have a
|
|
nontrivially ownership-qualified member.
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Rationale
|
|
|
|
Unlike in C, we can express all the necessary ARC semantics for
|
|
ownership-qualified subobjects as suboperations of the (default) special
|
|
member functions for the class. These functions then become non-trivial.
|
|
This has the non-obvious result that the class will have a non-trivial copy
|
|
constructor and non-trivial destructor; if this would not normally be true
|
|
outside of ARC, objects of the type will be passed and returned in an
|
|
ABI-incompatible manner.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.ownership.inference:
|
|
|
|
Ownership inference
|
|
-------------------
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.ownership.inference.variables:
|
|
|
|
Objects
|
|
^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
If an object is declared with retainable object owner type, but without an
|
|
explicit ownership qualifier, its type is implicitly adjusted to have
|
|
``__strong`` qualification.
|
|
|
|
As a special case, if the object's base type is ``Class`` (possibly
|
|
protocol-qualified), the type is adjusted to have ``__unsafe_unretained``
|
|
qualification instead.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.ownership.inference.indirect_parameters:
|
|
|
|
Indirect parameters
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
If a function or method parameter has type ``T*``, where ``T`` is an
|
|
ownership-unqualified retainable object pointer type, then:
|
|
|
|
* if ``T`` is ``const``-qualified or ``Class``, then it is implicitly
|
|
qualified with ``__unsafe_unretained``;
|
|
* otherwise, it is implicitly qualified with ``__autoreleasing``.
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Rationale
|
|
|
|
``__autoreleasing`` exists mostly for this case, the Cocoa convention for
|
|
out-parameters. Since a pointer to ``const`` is obviously not an
|
|
out-parameter, we instead use a type more useful for passing arrays. If the
|
|
user instead intends to pass in a *mutable* array, inferring
|
|
``__autoreleasing`` is the wrong thing to do; this directs some of the
|
|
caution in the following rules about writeback.
|
|
|
|
Such a type written anywhere else would be ill-formed by the general rule
|
|
requiring ownership qualifiers.
|
|
|
|
This rule does not apply in Objective-C++ if a parameter's type is dependent in
|
|
a template pattern and is only *instantiated* to a type which would be a
|
|
pointer to an unqualified retainable object pointer type. Such code is still
|
|
ill-formed.
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Rationale
|
|
|
|
The convention is very unlikely to be intentional in template code.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.ownership.inference.template.arguments:
|
|
|
|
Template arguments
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
If a template argument for a template type parameter is an retainable object
|
|
owner type that does not have an explicit ownership qualifier, it is adjusted
|
|
to have ``__strong`` qualification. This adjustment occurs regardless of
|
|
whether the template argument was deduced or explicitly specified.
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Rationale
|
|
|
|
``__strong`` is a useful default for containers (e.g., ``std::vector<id>``),
|
|
which would otherwise require explicit qualification. Moreover, unqualified
|
|
retainable object pointer types are unlikely to be useful within templates,
|
|
since they generally need to have a qualifier applied to the before being
|
|
used.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.method-families:
|
|
|
|
Method families
|
|
===============
|
|
|
|
An Objective-C method may fall into a :arc-term:`method family`, which is a
|
|
conventional set of behaviors ascribed to it by the Cocoa conventions.
|
|
|
|
A method is in a certain method family if:
|
|
|
|
* it has a ``objc_method_family`` attribute placing it in that family; or if
|
|
not that,
|
|
* it does not have an ``objc_method_family`` attribute placing it in a
|
|
different or no family, and
|
|
* its selector falls into the corresponding selector family, and
|
|
* its signature obeys the added restrictions of the method family.
|
|
|
|
A selector is in a certain selector family if, ignoring any leading
|
|
underscores, the first component of the selector either consists entirely of
|
|
the name of the method family or it begins with that name followed by a
|
|
character other than a lowercase letter. For example, ``_perform:with:`` and
|
|
``performWith:`` would fall into the ``perform`` family (if we recognized one),
|
|
but ``performing:with`` would not.
|
|
|
|
The families and their added restrictions are:
|
|
|
|
* ``alloc`` methods must return a retainable object pointer type.
|
|
* ``copy`` methods must return a retainable object pointer type.
|
|
* ``mutableCopy`` methods must return a retainable object pointer type.
|
|
* ``new`` methods must return a retainable object pointer type.
|
|
* ``init`` methods must be instance methods and must return an Objective-C
|
|
pointer type. Additionally, a program is ill-formed if it declares or
|
|
contains a call to an ``init`` method whose return type is neither ``id`` nor
|
|
a pointer to a super-class or sub-class of the declaring class (if the method
|
|
was declared on a class) or the static receiver type of the call (if it was
|
|
declared on a protocol).
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Rationale
|
|
|
|
There are a fair number of existing methods with ``init``-like selectors
|
|
which nonetheless don't follow the ``init`` conventions. Typically these
|
|
are either accidental naming collisions or helper methods called during
|
|
initialization. Because of the peculiar retain/release behavior of
|
|
``init`` methods, it's very important not to treat these methods as
|
|
``init`` methods if they aren't meant to be. It was felt that implicitly
|
|
defining these methods out of the family based on the exact relationship
|
|
between the return type and the declaring class would be much too subtle
|
|
and fragile. Therefore we identify a small number of legitimate-seeming
|
|
return types and call everything else an error. This serves the secondary
|
|
purpose of encouraging programmers not to accidentally give methods names
|
|
in the ``init`` family.
|
|
|
|
Note that a method with an ``init``-family selector which returns a
|
|
non-Objective-C type (e.g. ``void``) is perfectly well-formed; it simply
|
|
isn't in the ``init`` family.
|
|
|
|
A program is ill-formed if a method's declarations, implementations, and
|
|
overrides do not all have the same method family.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.family.attribute:
|
|
|
|
Explicit method family control
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
A method may be annotated with the ``objc_method_family`` attribute to
|
|
precisely control which method family it belongs to. If a method in an
|
|
``@implementation`` does not have this attribute, but there is a method
|
|
declared in the corresponding ``@interface`` that does, then the attribute is
|
|
copied to the declaration in the ``@implementation``. The attribute is
|
|
available outside of ARC, and may be tested for with the preprocessor query
|
|
``__has_attribute(objc_method_family)``.
|
|
|
|
The attribute is spelled
|
|
``__attribute__((objc_method_family(`` *family* ``)))``. If *family* is
|
|
``none``, the method has no family, even if it would otherwise be considered to
|
|
have one based on its selector and type. Otherwise, *family* must be one of
|
|
``alloc``, ``copy``, ``init``, ``mutableCopy``, or ``new``, in which case the
|
|
method is considered to belong to the corresponding family regardless of its
|
|
selector. It is an error if a method that is explicitly added to a family in
|
|
this way does not meet the requirements of the family other than the selector
|
|
naming convention.
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Rationale
|
|
|
|
The rules codified in this document describe the standard conventions of
|
|
Objective-C. However, as these conventions have not heretofore been enforced
|
|
by an unforgiving mechanical system, they are only imperfectly kept,
|
|
especially as they haven't always even been precisely defined. While it is
|
|
possible to define low-level ownership semantics with attributes like
|
|
``ns_returns_retained``, this attribute allows the user to communicate
|
|
semantic intent, which is of use both to ARC (which, e.g., treats calls to
|
|
``init`` specially) and the static analyzer.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.family.semantics:
|
|
|
|
Semantics of method families
|
|
----------------------------
|
|
|
|
A method's membership in a method family may imply non-standard semantics for
|
|
its parameters and return type.
|
|
|
|
Methods in the ``alloc``, ``copy``, ``mutableCopy``, and ``new`` families ---
|
|
that is, methods in all the currently-defined families except ``init`` ---
|
|
implicitly :ref:`return a retained object
|
|
<arc.object.operands.retained-return-values>` as if they were annotated with
|
|
the ``ns_returns_retained`` attribute. This can be overridden by annotating
|
|
the method with either of the ``ns_returns_autoreleased`` or
|
|
``ns_returns_not_retained`` attributes.
|
|
|
|
Properties also follow same naming rules as methods. This means that those in
|
|
the ``alloc``, ``copy``, ``mutableCopy``, and ``new`` families provide access
|
|
to :ref:`retained objects <arc.object.operands.retained-return-values>`. This
|
|
can be overridden by annotating the property with ``ns_returns_not_retained``
|
|
attribute.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.family.semantics.init:
|
|
|
|
Semantics of ``init``
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
Methods in the ``init`` family implicitly :ref:`consume
|
|
<arc.objects.operands.consumed>` their ``self`` parameter and :ref:`return a
|
|
retained object <arc.object.operands.retained-return-values>`. Neither of
|
|
these properties can be altered through attributes.
|
|
|
|
A call to an ``init`` method with a receiver that is either ``self`` (possibly
|
|
parenthesized or casted) or ``super`` is called a :arc-term:`delegate init
|
|
call`. It is an error for a delegate init call to be made except from an
|
|
``init`` method, and excluding blocks within such methods.
|
|
|
|
As an exception to the :ref:`usual rule <arc.misc.self>`, the variable ``self``
|
|
is mutable in an ``init`` method and has the usual semantics for a ``__strong``
|
|
variable. However, it is undefined behavior and the program is ill-formed, no
|
|
diagnostic required, if an ``init`` method attempts to use the previous value
|
|
of ``self`` after the completion of a delegate init call. It is conventional,
|
|
but not required, for an ``init`` method to return ``self``.
|
|
|
|
It is undefined behavior for a program to cause two or more calls to ``init``
|
|
methods on the same object, except that each ``init`` method invocation may
|
|
perform at most one delegate init call.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.family.semantics.result_type:
|
|
|
|
Related result types
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
Certain methods are candidates to have :arc-term:`related result types`:
|
|
|
|
* class methods in the ``alloc`` and ``new`` method families
|
|
* instance methods in the ``init`` family
|
|
* the instance method ``self``
|
|
* outside of ARC, the instance methods ``retain`` and ``autorelease``
|
|
|
|
If the formal result type of such a method is ``id`` or protocol-qualified
|
|
``id``, or a type equal to the declaring class or a superclass, then it is said
|
|
to have a related result type. In this case, when invoked in an explicit
|
|
message send, it is assumed to return a type related to the type of the
|
|
receiver:
|
|
|
|
* if it is a class method, and the receiver is a class name ``T``, the message
|
|
send expression has type ``T*``; otherwise
|
|
* if it is an instance method, and the receiver has type ``T``, the message
|
|
send expression has type ``T``; otherwise
|
|
* the message send expression has the normal result type of the method.
|
|
|
|
This is a new rule of the Objective-C language and applies outside of ARC.
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Rationale
|
|
|
|
ARC's automatic code emission is more prone than most code to signature
|
|
errors, i.e. errors where a call was emitted against one method signature,
|
|
but the implementing method has an incompatible signature. Having more
|
|
precise type information helps drastically lower this risk, as well as
|
|
catching a number of latent bugs.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.optimization:
|
|
|
|
Optimization
|
|
============
|
|
|
|
Within this section, the word :arc-term:`function` will be used to
|
|
refer to any structured unit of code, be it a C function, an
|
|
Objective-C method, or a block.
|
|
|
|
This specification describes ARC as performing specific ``retain`` and
|
|
``release`` operations on retainable object pointers at specific
|
|
points during the execution of a program. These operations make up a
|
|
non-contiguous subsequence of the computation history of the program.
|
|
The portion of this sequence for a particular retainable object
|
|
pointer for which a specific function execution is directly
|
|
responsible is the :arc-term:`formal local retain history` of the
|
|
object pointer. The corresponding actual sequence executed is the
|
|
`dynamic local retain history`.
|
|
|
|
However, under certain circumstances, ARC is permitted to re-order and
|
|
eliminate operations in a manner which may alter the overall
|
|
computation history beyond what is permitted by the general "as if"
|
|
rule of C/C++ and the :ref:`restrictions <arc.objects.retains>` on
|
|
the implementation of ``retain`` and ``release``.
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Rationale
|
|
|
|
Specifically, ARC is sometimes permitted to optimize ``release``
|
|
operations in ways which might cause an object to be deallocated
|
|
before it would otherwise be. Without this, it would be almost
|
|
impossible to eliminate any ``retain``/``release`` pairs. For
|
|
example, consider the following code:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: objc
|
|
|
|
id x = _ivar;
|
|
[x foo];
|
|
|
|
If we were not permitted in any event to shorten the lifetime of the
|
|
object in ``x``, then we would not be able to eliminate this retain
|
|
and release unless we could prove that the message send could not
|
|
modify ``_ivar`` (or deallocate ``self``). Since message sends are
|
|
opaque to the optimizer, this is not possible, and so ARC's hands
|
|
would be almost completely tied.
|
|
|
|
ARC makes no guarantees about the execution of a computation history
|
|
which contains undefined behavior. In particular, ARC makes no
|
|
guarantees in the presence of race conditions.
|
|
|
|
ARC may assume that any retainable object pointers it receives or
|
|
generates are instantaneously valid from that point until a point
|
|
which, by the concurrency model of the host language, happens-after
|
|
the generation of the pointer and happens-before a release of that
|
|
object (possibly via an aliasing pointer or indirectly due to
|
|
destruction of a different object).
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Rationale
|
|
|
|
There is very little point in trying to guarantee correctness in the
|
|
presence of race conditions. ARC does not have a stack-scanning
|
|
garbage collector, and guaranteeing the atomicity of every load and
|
|
store operation would be prohibitive and preclude a vast amount of
|
|
optimization.
|
|
|
|
ARC may assume that non-ARC code engages in sensible balancing
|
|
behavior and does not rely on exact or minimum retain count values
|
|
except as guaranteed by ``__strong`` object invariants or +1 transfer
|
|
conventions. For example, if an object is provably double-retained
|
|
and double-released, ARC may eliminate the inner retain and release;
|
|
it does not need to guard against code which performs an unbalanced
|
|
release followed by a "balancing" retain.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.optimization.liveness:
|
|
|
|
Object liveness
|
|
---------------
|
|
|
|
ARC may not allow a retainable object ``X`` to be deallocated at a
|
|
time ``T`` in a computation history if:
|
|
|
|
* ``X`` is the value stored in a ``__strong`` object ``S`` with
|
|
:ref:`precise lifetime semantics <arc.optimization.precise>`, or
|
|
|
|
* ``X`` is the value stored in a ``__strong`` object ``S`` with
|
|
imprecise lifetime semantics and, at some point after ``T`` but
|
|
before the next store to ``S``, the computation history features a
|
|
load from ``S`` and in some way depends on the value loaded, or
|
|
|
|
* ``X`` is a value described as being released at the end of the
|
|
current full-expression and, at some point after ``T`` but before
|
|
the end of the full-expression, the computation history depends
|
|
on that value.
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Rationale
|
|
|
|
The intent of the second rule is to say that objects held in normal
|
|
``__strong`` local variables may be released as soon as the value in
|
|
the variable is no longer being used: either the variable stops
|
|
being used completely or a new value is stored in the variable.
|
|
|
|
The intent of the third rule is to say that return values may be
|
|
released after they've been used.
|
|
|
|
A computation history depends on a pointer value ``P`` if it:
|
|
|
|
* performs a pointer comparison with ``P``,
|
|
* loads from ``P``,
|
|
* stores to ``P``,
|
|
* depends on a pointer value ``Q`` derived via pointer arithmetic
|
|
from ``P`` (including an instance-variable or field access), or
|
|
* depends on a pointer value ``Q`` loaded from ``P``.
|
|
|
|
Dependency applies only to values derived directly or indirectly from
|
|
a particular expression result and does not occur merely because a
|
|
separate pointer value dynamically aliases ``P``. Furthermore, this
|
|
dependency is not carried by values that are stored to objects.
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Rationale
|
|
|
|
The restrictions on dependency are intended to make this analysis
|
|
feasible by an optimizer with only incomplete information about a
|
|
program. Essentially, dependence is carried to "obvious" uses of a
|
|
pointer. Merely passing a pointer argument to a function does not
|
|
itself cause dependence, but since generally the optimizer will not
|
|
be able to prove that the function doesn't depend on that parameter,
|
|
it will be forced to conservatively assume it does.
|
|
|
|
Dependency propagates to values loaded from a pointer because those
|
|
values might be invalidated by deallocating the object. For
|
|
example, given the code ``__strong id x = p->ivar;``, ARC must not
|
|
move the release of ``p`` to between the load of ``p->ivar`` and the
|
|
retain of that value for storing into ``x``.
|
|
|
|
Dependency does not propagate through stores of dependent pointer
|
|
values because doing so would allow dependency to outlive the
|
|
full-expression which produced the original value. For example, the
|
|
address of an instance variable could be written to some global
|
|
location and then freely accessed during the lifetime of the local,
|
|
or a function could return an inner pointer of an object and store
|
|
it to a local. These cases would be potentially impossible to
|
|
reason about and so would basically prevent any optimizations based
|
|
on imprecise lifetime. There are also uncommon enough to make it
|
|
reasonable to require the precise-lifetime annotation if someone
|
|
really wants to rely on them.
|
|
|
|
Dependency does propagate through return values of pointer type.
|
|
The compelling source of need for this rule is a property accessor
|
|
which returns an un-autoreleased result; the calling function must
|
|
have the chance to operate on the value, e.g. to retain it, before
|
|
ARC releases the original pointer. Note again, however, that
|
|
dependence does not survive a store, so ARC does not guarantee the
|
|
continued validity of the return value past the end of the
|
|
full-expression.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.optimization.object_lifetime:
|
|
|
|
No object lifetime extension
|
|
----------------------------
|
|
|
|
If, in the formal computation history of the program, an object ``X``
|
|
has been deallocated by the time of an observable side-effect, then
|
|
ARC must cause ``X`` to be deallocated by no later than the occurrence
|
|
of that side-effect, except as influenced by the re-ordering of the
|
|
destruction of objects.
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Rationale
|
|
|
|
This rule is intended to prohibit ARC from observably extending the
|
|
lifetime of a retainable object, other than as specified in this
|
|
document. Together with the rule limiting the transformation of
|
|
releases, this rule requires ARC to eliminate retains and release
|
|
only in pairs.
|
|
|
|
ARC's power to reorder the destruction of objects is critical to its
|
|
ability to do any optimization, for essentially the same reason that
|
|
it must retain the power to decrease the lifetime of an object.
|
|
Unfortunately, while it's generally poor style for the destruction
|
|
of objects to have arbitrary side-effects, it's certainly possible.
|
|
Hence the caveat.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.optimization.precise:
|
|
|
|
Precise lifetime semantics
|
|
--------------------------
|
|
|
|
In general, ARC maintains an invariant that a retainable object pointer held in
|
|
a ``__strong`` object will be retained for the full formal lifetime of the
|
|
object. Objects subject to this invariant have :arc-term:`precise lifetime
|
|
semantics`.
|
|
|
|
By default, local variables of automatic storage duration do not have precise
|
|
lifetime semantics. Such objects are simply strong references which hold
|
|
values of retainable object pointer type, and these values are still fully
|
|
subject to the optimizations on values under local control.
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Rationale
|
|
|
|
Applying these precise-lifetime semantics strictly would be prohibitive.
|
|
Many useful optimizations that might theoretically decrease the lifetime of
|
|
an object would be rendered impossible. Essentially, it promises too much.
|
|
|
|
A local variable of retainable object owner type and automatic storage duration
|
|
may be annotated with the ``objc_precise_lifetime`` attribute to indicate that
|
|
it should be considered to be an object with precise lifetime semantics.
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Rationale
|
|
|
|
Nonetheless, it is sometimes useful to be able to force an object to be
|
|
released at a precise time, even if that object does not appear to be used.
|
|
This is likely to be uncommon enough that the syntactic weight of explicitly
|
|
requesting these semantics will not be burdensome, and may even make the code
|
|
clearer.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.misc:
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
=============
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.misc.special_methods:
|
|
|
|
Special methods
|
|
---------------
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.misc.special_methods.retain:
|
|
|
|
Memory management methods
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
A program is ill-formed if it contains a method definition, message send, or
|
|
``@selector`` expression for any of the following selectors:
|
|
|
|
* ``autorelease``
|
|
* ``release``
|
|
* ``retain``
|
|
* ``retainCount``
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Rationale
|
|
|
|
``retainCount`` is banned because ARC robs it of consistent semantics. The
|
|
others were banned after weighing three options for how to deal with message
|
|
sends:
|
|
|
|
**Honoring** them would work out very poorly if a programmer naively or
|
|
accidentally tried to incorporate code written for manual retain/release code
|
|
into an ARC program. At best, such code would do twice as much work as
|
|
necessary; quite frequently, however, ARC and the explicit code would both
|
|
try to balance the same retain, leading to crashes. The cost is losing the
|
|
ability to perform "unrooted" retains, i.e. retains not logically
|
|
corresponding to a strong reference in the object graph.
|
|
|
|
**Ignoring** them would badly violate user expectations about their code.
|
|
While it *would* make it easier to develop code simultaneously for ARC and
|
|
non-ARC, there is very little reason to do so except for certain library
|
|
developers. ARC and non-ARC translation units share an execution model and
|
|
can seamlessly interoperate. Within a translation unit, a developer who
|
|
faithfully maintains their code in non-ARC mode is suffering all the
|
|
restrictions of ARC for zero benefit, while a developer who isn't testing the
|
|
non-ARC mode is likely to be unpleasantly surprised if they try to go back to
|
|
it.
|
|
|
|
**Banning** them has the disadvantage of making it very awkward to migrate
|
|
existing code to ARC. The best answer to that, given a number of other
|
|
changes and restrictions in ARC, is to provide a specialized tool to assist
|
|
users in that migration.
|
|
|
|
Implementing these methods was banned because they are too integral to the
|
|
semantics of ARC; many tricks which worked tolerably under manual reference
|
|
counting will misbehave if ARC performs an ephemeral extra retain or two. If
|
|
absolutely required, it is still possible to implement them in non-ARC code,
|
|
for example in a category; the implementations must obey the :ref:`semantics
|
|
<arc.objects.retains>` laid out elsewhere in this document.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.misc.special_methods.dealloc:
|
|
|
|
``dealloc``
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
A program is ill-formed if it contains a message send or ``@selector``
|
|
expression for the selector ``dealloc``.
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Rationale
|
|
|
|
There are no legitimate reasons to call ``dealloc`` directly.
|
|
|
|
A class may provide a method definition for an instance method named
|
|
``dealloc``. This method will be called after the final ``release`` of the
|
|
object but before it is deallocated or any of its instance variables are
|
|
destroyed. The superclass's implementation of ``dealloc`` will be called
|
|
automatically when the method returns.
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Rationale
|
|
|
|
Even though ARC destroys instance variables automatically, there are still
|
|
legitimate reasons to write a ``dealloc`` method, such as freeing
|
|
non-retainable resources. Failing to call ``[super dealloc]`` in such a
|
|
method is nearly always a bug. Sometimes, the object is simply trying to
|
|
prevent itself from being destroyed, but ``dealloc`` is really far too late
|
|
for the object to be raising such objections. Somewhat more legitimately, an
|
|
object may have been pool-allocated and should not be deallocated with
|
|
``free``; for now, this can only be supported with a ``dealloc``
|
|
implementation outside of ARC. Such an implementation must be very careful
|
|
to do all the other work that ``NSObject``'s ``dealloc`` would, which is
|
|
outside the scope of this document to describe.
|
|
|
|
The instance variables for an ARC-compiled class will be destroyed at some
|
|
point after control enters the ``dealloc`` method for the root class of the
|
|
class. The ordering of the destruction of instance variables is unspecified,
|
|
both within a single class and between subclasses and superclasses.
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Rationale
|
|
|
|
The traditional, non-ARC pattern for destroying instance variables is to
|
|
destroy them immediately before calling ``[super dealloc]``. Unfortunately,
|
|
message sends from the superclass are quite capable of reaching methods in
|
|
the subclass, and those methods may well read or write to those instance
|
|
variables. Making such message sends from dealloc is generally discouraged,
|
|
since the subclass may well rely on other invariants that were broken during
|
|
``dealloc``, but it's not so inescapably dangerous that we felt comfortable
|
|
calling it undefined behavior. Therefore we chose to delay destroying the
|
|
instance variables to a point at which message sends are clearly disallowed:
|
|
the point at which the root class's deallocation routines take over.
|
|
|
|
In most code, the difference is not observable. It can, however, be observed
|
|
if an instance variable holds a strong reference to an object whose
|
|
deallocation will trigger a side-effect which must be carefully ordered with
|
|
respect to the destruction of the super class. Such code violates the design
|
|
principle that semantically important behavior should be explicit. A simple
|
|
fix is to clear the instance variable manually during ``dealloc``; a more
|
|
holistic solution is to move semantically important side-effects out of
|
|
``dealloc`` and into a separate teardown phase which can rely on working with
|
|
well-formed objects.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.misc.autoreleasepool:
|
|
|
|
``@autoreleasepool``
|
|
--------------------
|
|
|
|
To simplify the use of autorelease pools, and to bring them under the control
|
|
of the compiler, a new kind of statement is available in Objective-C. It is
|
|
written ``@autoreleasepool`` followed by a *compound-statement*, i.e. by a new
|
|
scope delimited by curly braces. Upon entry to this block, the current state
|
|
of the autorelease pool is captured. When the block is exited normally,
|
|
whether by fallthrough or directed control flow (such as ``return`` or
|
|
``break``), the autorelease pool is restored to the saved state, releasing all
|
|
the objects in it. When the block is exited with an exception, the pool is not
|
|
drained.
|
|
|
|
``@autoreleasepool`` may be used in non-ARC translation units, with equivalent
|
|
semantics.
|
|
|
|
A program is ill-formed if it refers to the ``NSAutoreleasePool`` class.
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Rationale
|
|
|
|
Autorelease pools are clearly important for the compiler to reason about, but
|
|
it is far too much to expect the compiler to accurately reason about control
|
|
dependencies between two calls. It is also very easy to accidentally forget
|
|
to drain an autorelease pool when using the manual API, and this can
|
|
significantly inflate the process's high-water-mark. The introduction of a
|
|
new scope is unfortunate but basically required for sane interaction with the
|
|
rest of the language. Not draining the pool during an unwind is apparently
|
|
required by the Objective-C exceptions implementation.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.misc.self:
|
|
|
|
``self``
|
|
--------
|
|
|
|
The ``self`` parameter variable of an Objective-C method is never actually
|
|
retained by the implementation. It is undefined behavior, or at least
|
|
dangerous, to cause an object to be deallocated during a message send to that
|
|
object.
|
|
|
|
To make this safe, for Objective-C instance methods ``self`` is implicitly
|
|
``const`` unless the method is in the :ref:`init family
|
|
<arc.family.semantics.init>`. Further, ``self`` is **always** implicitly
|
|
``const`` within a class method.
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Rationale
|
|
|
|
The cost of retaining ``self`` in all methods was found to be prohibitive, as
|
|
it tends to be live across calls, preventing the optimizer from proving that
|
|
the retain and release are unnecessary --- for good reason, as it's quite
|
|
possible in theory to cause an object to be deallocated during its execution
|
|
without this retain and release. Since it's extremely uncommon to actually
|
|
do so, even unintentionally, and since there's no natural way for the
|
|
programmer to remove this retain/release pair otherwise (as there is for
|
|
other parameters by, say, making the variable ``__unsafe_unretained``), we
|
|
chose to make this optimizing assumption and shift some amount of risk to the
|
|
user.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.misc.enumeration:
|
|
|
|
Fast enumeration iteration variables
|
|
------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
If a variable is declared in the condition of an Objective-C fast enumeration
|
|
loop, and the variable has no explicit ownership qualifier, then it is
|
|
qualified with ``const __strong`` and objects encountered during the
|
|
enumeration are not actually retained.
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Rationale
|
|
|
|
This is an optimization made possible because fast enumeration loops promise
|
|
to keep the objects retained during enumeration, and the collection itself
|
|
cannot be synchronously modified. It can be overridden by explicitly
|
|
qualifying the variable with ``__strong``, which will make the variable
|
|
mutable again and cause the loop to retain the objects it encounters.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.misc.blocks:
|
|
|
|
Blocks
|
|
------
|
|
|
|
The implicit ``const`` capture variables created when evaluating a block
|
|
literal expression have the same ownership semantics as the local variables
|
|
they capture. The capture is performed by reading from the captured variable
|
|
and initializing the capture variable with that value; the capture variable is
|
|
destroyed when the block literal is, i.e. at the end of the enclosing scope.
|
|
|
|
The :ref:`inference <arc.ownership.inference>` rules apply equally to
|
|
``__block`` variables, which is a shift in semantics from non-ARC, where
|
|
``__block`` variables did not implicitly retain during capture.
|
|
|
|
``__block`` variables of retainable object owner type are moved off the stack
|
|
by initializing the heap copy with the result of moving from the stack copy.
|
|
|
|
With the exception of retains done as part of initializing a ``__strong``
|
|
parameter variable or reading a ``__weak`` variable, whenever these semantics
|
|
call for retaining a value of block-pointer type, it has the effect of a
|
|
``Block_copy``. The optimizer may remove such copies when it sees that the
|
|
result is used only as an argument to a call.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.misc.exceptions:
|
|
|
|
Exceptions
|
|
----------
|
|
|
|
By default in Objective C, ARC is not exception-safe for normal releases:
|
|
|
|
* It does not end the lifetime of ``__strong`` variables when their scopes are
|
|
abnormally terminated by an exception.
|
|
* It does not perform releases which would occur at the end of a
|
|
full-expression if that full-expression throws an exception.
|
|
|
|
A program may be compiled with the option ``-fobjc-arc-exceptions`` in order to
|
|
enable these, or with the option ``-fno-objc-arc-exceptions`` to explicitly
|
|
disable them, with the last such argument "winning".
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Rationale
|
|
|
|
The standard Cocoa convention is that exceptions signal programmer error and
|
|
are not intended to be recovered from. Making code exceptions-safe by
|
|
default would impose severe runtime and code size penalties on code that
|
|
typically does not actually care about exceptions safety. Therefore,
|
|
ARC-generated code leaks by default on exceptions, which is just fine if the
|
|
process is going to be immediately terminated anyway. Programs which do care
|
|
about recovering from exceptions should enable the option.
|
|
|
|
In Objective-C++, ``-fobjc-arc-exceptions`` is enabled by default.
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Rationale
|
|
|
|
C++ already introduces pervasive exceptions-cleanup code of the sort that ARC
|
|
introduces. C++ programmers who have not already disabled exceptions are
|
|
much more likely to actual require exception-safety.
|
|
|
|
ARC does end the lifetimes of ``__weak`` objects when an exception terminates
|
|
their scope unless exceptions are disabled in the compiler.
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Rationale
|
|
|
|
The consequence of a local ``__weak`` object not being destroyed is very
|
|
likely to be corruption of the Objective-C runtime, so we want to be safer
|
|
here. Of course, potentially massive leaks are about as likely to take down
|
|
the process as this corruption is if the program does try to recover from
|
|
exceptions.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.misc.interior:
|
|
|
|
Interior pointers
|
|
-----------------
|
|
|
|
An Objective-C method returning a non-retainable pointer may be annotated with
|
|
the ``objc_returns_inner_pointer`` attribute to indicate that it returns a
|
|
handle to the internal data of an object, and that this reference will be
|
|
invalidated if the object is destroyed. When such a message is sent to an
|
|
object, the object's lifetime will be extended until at least the earliest of:
|
|
|
|
* the last use of the returned pointer, or any pointer derived from it, in the
|
|
calling function or
|
|
* the autorelease pool is restored to a previous state.
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Rationale
|
|
|
|
Rationale: not all memory and resources are managed with reference counts; it
|
|
is common for objects to manage private resources in their own, private way.
|
|
Typically these resources are completely encapsulated within the object, but
|
|
some classes offer their users direct access for efficiency. If ARC is not
|
|
aware of methods that return such "interior" pointers, its optimizations can
|
|
cause the owning object to be reclaimed too soon. This attribute informs ARC
|
|
that it must tread lightly.
|
|
|
|
The extension rules are somewhat intentionally vague. The autorelease pool
|
|
limit is there to permit a simple implementation to simply retain and
|
|
autorelease the receiver. The other limit permits some amount of
|
|
optimization. The phrase "derived from" is intended to encompass the results
|
|
both of pointer transformations, such as casts and arithmetic, and of loading
|
|
from such derived pointers; furthermore, it applies whether or not such
|
|
derivations are applied directly in the calling code or by other utility code
|
|
(for example, the C library routine ``strchr``). However, the implementation
|
|
never need account for uses after a return from the code which calls the
|
|
method returning an interior pointer.
|
|
|
|
As an exception, no extension is required if the receiver is loaded directly
|
|
from a ``__strong`` object with :ref:`precise lifetime semantics
|
|
<arc.optimization.precise>`.
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Rationale
|
|
|
|
Implicit autoreleases carry the risk of significantly inflating memory use,
|
|
so it's important to provide users a way of avoiding these autoreleases.
|
|
Tying this to precise lifetime semantics is ideal, as for local variables
|
|
this requires a very explicit annotation, which allows ARC to trust the user
|
|
with good cheer.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.misc.c-retainable:
|
|
|
|
C retainable pointer types
|
|
--------------------------
|
|
|
|
A type is a :arc-term:`C retainable pointer type` if it is a pointer to
|
|
(possibly qualified) ``void`` or a pointer to a (possibly qualifier) ``struct``
|
|
or ``class`` type.
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Rationale
|
|
|
|
ARC does not manage pointers of CoreFoundation type (or any of the related
|
|
families of retainable C pointers which interoperate with Objective-C for
|
|
retain/release operation). In fact, ARC does not even know how to
|
|
distinguish these types from arbitrary C pointer types. The intent of this
|
|
concept is to filter out some obviously non-object types while leaving a hook
|
|
for later tightening if a means of exhaustively marking CF types is made
|
|
available.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.misc.c-retainable.audit:
|
|
|
|
Auditing of C retainable pointer interfaces
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
:when-revised:`[beginning Apple 4.0, LLVM 3.1]`
|
|
|
|
A C function may be marked with the ``cf_audited_transfer`` attribute to
|
|
express that, except as otherwise marked with attributes, it obeys the
|
|
parameter (consuming vs. non-consuming) and return (retained vs. non-retained)
|
|
conventions for a C function of its name, namely:
|
|
|
|
* A parameter of C retainable pointer type is assumed to not be consumed
|
|
unless it is marked with the ``cf_consumed`` attribute, and
|
|
* A result of C retainable pointer type is assumed to not be returned retained
|
|
unless the function is either marked ``cf_returns_retained`` or it follows
|
|
the create/copy naming convention and is not marked
|
|
``cf_returns_not_retained``.
|
|
|
|
A function obeys the :arc-term:`create/copy` naming convention if its name
|
|
contains as a substring:
|
|
|
|
* either "Create" or "Copy" not followed by a lowercase letter, or
|
|
* either "create" or "copy" not followed by a lowercase letter and
|
|
not preceded by any letter, whether uppercase or lowercase.
|
|
|
|
A second attribute, ``cf_unknown_transfer``, signifies that a function's
|
|
transfer semantics cannot be accurately captured using any of these
|
|
annotations. A program is ill-formed if it annotates the same function with
|
|
both ``cf_audited_transfer`` and ``cf_unknown_transfer``.
|
|
|
|
A pragma is provided to facilitate the mass annotation of interfaces:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: objc
|
|
|
|
#pragma clang arc_cf_code_audited begin
|
|
...
|
|
#pragma clang arc_cf_code_audited end
|
|
|
|
All C functions declared within the extent of this pragma are treated as if
|
|
annotated with the ``cf_audited_transfer`` attribute unless they otherwise have
|
|
the ``cf_unknown_transfer`` attribute. The pragma is accepted in all language
|
|
modes. A program is ill-formed if it attempts to change files, whether by
|
|
including a file or ending the current file, within the extent of this pragma.
|
|
|
|
It is possible to test for all the features in this section with
|
|
``__has_feature(arc_cf_code_audited)``.
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Rationale
|
|
|
|
A significant inconvenience in ARC programming is the necessity of
|
|
interacting with APIs based around C retainable pointers. These features are
|
|
designed to make it relatively easy for API authors to quickly review and
|
|
annotate their interfaces, in turn improving the fidelity of tools such as
|
|
the static analyzer and ARC. The single-file restriction on the pragma is
|
|
designed to eliminate the risk of accidentally annotating some other header's
|
|
interfaces.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.runtime:
|
|
|
|
Runtime support
|
|
===============
|
|
|
|
This section describes the interaction between the ARC runtime and the code
|
|
generated by the ARC compiler. This is not part of the ARC language
|
|
specification; instead, it is effectively a language-specific ABI supplement,
|
|
akin to the "Itanium" generic ABI for C++.
|
|
|
|
Ownership qualification does not alter the storage requirements for objects,
|
|
except that it is undefined behavior if a ``__weak`` object is inadequately
|
|
aligned for an object of type ``id``. The other qualifiers may be used on
|
|
explicitly under-aligned memory.
|
|
|
|
The runtime tracks ``__weak`` objects which holds non-null values. It is
|
|
undefined behavior to direct modify a ``__weak`` object which is being tracked
|
|
by the runtime except through an
|
|
:ref:`objc_storeWeak <arc.runtime.objc_storeWeak>`,
|
|
:ref:`objc_destroyWeak <arc.runtime.objc_destroyWeak>`, or
|
|
:ref:`objc_moveWeak <arc.runtime.objc_moveWeak>` call.
|
|
|
|
The runtime must provide a number of new entrypoints which the compiler may
|
|
emit, which are described in the remainder of this section.
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Rationale
|
|
|
|
Several of these functions are semantically equivalent to a message send; we
|
|
emit calls to C functions instead because:
|
|
|
|
* the machine code to do so is significantly smaller,
|
|
* it is much easier to recognize the C functions in the ARC optimizer, and
|
|
* a sufficient sophisticated runtime may be able to avoid the message send in
|
|
common cases.
|
|
|
|
Several other of these functions are "fused" operations which can be
|
|
described entirely in terms of other operations. We use the fused operations
|
|
primarily as a code-size optimization, although in some cases there is also a
|
|
real potential for avoiding redundant operations in the runtime.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.runtime.objc_autorelease:
|
|
|
|
``id objc_autorelease(id value);``
|
|
----------------------------------
|
|
|
|
*Precondition:* ``value`` is null or a pointer to a valid object.
|
|
|
|
If ``value`` is null, this call has no effect. Otherwise, it adds the object
|
|
to the innermost autorelease pool exactly as if the object had been sent the
|
|
``autorelease`` message.
|
|
|
|
Always returns ``value``.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.runtime.objc_autoreleasePoolPop:
|
|
|
|
``void objc_autoreleasePoolPop(void *pool);``
|
|
---------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
*Precondition:* ``pool`` is the result of a previous call to
|
|
:ref:`objc_autoreleasePoolPush <arc.runtime.objc_autoreleasePoolPush>` on the
|
|
current thread, where neither ``pool`` nor any enclosing pool have previously
|
|
been popped.
|
|
|
|
Releases all the objects added to the given autorelease pool and any
|
|
autorelease pools it encloses, then sets the current autorelease pool to the
|
|
pool directly enclosing ``pool``.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.runtime.objc_autoreleasePoolPush:
|
|
|
|
``void *objc_autoreleasePoolPush(void);``
|
|
-----------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Creates a new autorelease pool that is enclosed by the current pool, makes that
|
|
the current pool, and returns an opaque "handle" to it.
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Rationale
|
|
|
|
While the interface is described as an explicit hierarchy of pools, the rules
|
|
allow the implementation to just keep a stack of objects, using the stack
|
|
depth as the opaque pool handle.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.runtime.objc_autoreleaseReturnValue:
|
|
|
|
``id objc_autoreleaseReturnValue(id value);``
|
|
---------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
*Precondition:* ``value`` is null or a pointer to a valid object.
|
|
|
|
If ``value`` is null, this call has no effect. Otherwise, it makes a best
|
|
effort to hand off ownership of a retain count on the object to a call to
|
|
:ref:`objc_retainAutoreleasedReturnValue
|
|
<arc.runtime.objc_retainAutoreleasedReturnValue>` for the same object in an
|
|
enclosing call frame. If this is not possible, the object is autoreleased as
|
|
above.
|
|
|
|
Always returns ``value``.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.runtime.objc_copyWeak:
|
|
|
|
``void objc_copyWeak(id *dest, id *src);``
|
|
------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
*Precondition:* ``src`` is a valid pointer which either contains a null pointer
|
|
or has been registered as a ``__weak`` object. ``dest`` is a valid pointer
|
|
which has not been registered as a ``__weak`` object.
|
|
|
|
``dest`` is initialized to be equivalent to ``src``, potentially registering it
|
|
with the runtime. Equivalent to the following code:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: objc
|
|
|
|
void objc_copyWeak(id *dest, id *src) {
|
|
objc_release(objc_initWeak(dest, objc_loadWeakRetained(src)));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Must be atomic with respect to calls to ``objc_storeWeak`` on ``src``.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.runtime.objc_destroyWeak:
|
|
|
|
``void objc_destroyWeak(id *object);``
|
|
--------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
*Precondition:* ``object`` is a valid pointer which either contains a null
|
|
pointer or has been registered as a ``__weak`` object.
|
|
|
|
``object`` is unregistered as a weak object, if it ever was. The current value
|
|
of ``object`` is left unspecified; otherwise, equivalent to the following code:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: objc
|
|
|
|
void objc_destroyWeak(id *object) {
|
|
objc_storeWeak(object, nil);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Does not need to be atomic with respect to calls to ``objc_storeWeak`` on
|
|
``object``.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.runtime.objc_initWeak:
|
|
|
|
``id objc_initWeak(id *object, id value);``
|
|
-------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
*Precondition:* ``object`` is a valid pointer which has not been registered as
|
|
a ``__weak`` object. ``value`` is null or a pointer to a valid object.
|
|
|
|
If ``value`` is a null pointer or the object to which it points has begun
|
|
deallocation, ``object`` is zero-initialized. Otherwise, ``object`` is
|
|
registered as a ``__weak`` object pointing to ``value``. Equivalent to the
|
|
following code:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: objc
|
|
|
|
id objc_initWeak(id *object, id value) {
|
|
*object = nil;
|
|
return objc_storeWeak(object, value);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Returns the value of ``object`` after the call.
|
|
|
|
Does not need to be atomic with respect to calls to ``objc_storeWeak`` on
|
|
``object``.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.runtime.objc_loadWeak:
|
|
|
|
``id objc_loadWeak(id *object);``
|
|
---------------------------------
|
|
|
|
*Precondition:* ``object`` is a valid pointer which either contains a null
|
|
pointer or has been registered as a ``__weak`` object.
|
|
|
|
If ``object`` is registered as a ``__weak`` object, and the last value stored
|
|
into ``object`` has not yet been deallocated or begun deallocation, retains and
|
|
autoreleases that value and returns it. Otherwise returns null. Equivalent to
|
|
the following code:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: objc
|
|
|
|
id objc_loadWeak(id *object) {
|
|
return objc_autorelease(objc_loadWeakRetained(object));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Must be atomic with respect to calls to ``objc_storeWeak`` on ``object``.
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Rationale
|
|
|
|
Loading weak references would be inherently prone to race conditions without
|
|
the retain.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.runtime.objc_loadWeakRetained:
|
|
|
|
``id objc_loadWeakRetained(id *object);``
|
|
-----------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
*Precondition:* ``object`` is a valid pointer which either contains a null
|
|
pointer or has been registered as a ``__weak`` object.
|
|
|
|
If ``object`` is registered as a ``__weak`` object, and the last value stored
|
|
into ``object`` has not yet been deallocated or begun deallocation, retains
|
|
that value and returns it. Otherwise returns null.
|
|
|
|
Must be atomic with respect to calls to ``objc_storeWeak`` on ``object``.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.runtime.objc_moveWeak:
|
|
|
|
``void objc_moveWeak(id *dest, id *src);``
|
|
------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
*Precondition:* ``src`` is a valid pointer which either contains a null pointer
|
|
or has been registered as a ``__weak`` object. ``dest`` is a valid pointer
|
|
which has not been registered as a ``__weak`` object.
|
|
|
|
``dest`` is initialized to be equivalent to ``src``, potentially registering it
|
|
with the runtime. ``src`` may then be left in its original state, in which
|
|
case this call is equivalent to :ref:`objc_copyWeak
|
|
<arc.runtime.objc_copyWeak>`, or it may be left as null.
|
|
|
|
Must be atomic with respect to calls to ``objc_storeWeak`` on ``src``.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.runtime.objc_release:
|
|
|
|
``void objc_release(id value);``
|
|
--------------------------------
|
|
|
|
*Precondition:* ``value`` is null or a pointer to a valid object.
|
|
|
|
If ``value`` is null, this call has no effect. Otherwise, it performs a
|
|
release operation exactly as if the object had been sent the ``release``
|
|
message.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.runtime.objc_retain:
|
|
|
|
``id objc_retain(id value);``
|
|
-----------------------------
|
|
|
|
*Precondition:* ``value`` is null or a pointer to a valid object.
|
|
|
|
If ``value`` is null, this call has no effect. Otherwise, it performs a retain
|
|
operation exactly as if the object had been sent the ``retain`` message.
|
|
|
|
Always returns ``value``.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.runtime.objc_retainAutorelease:
|
|
|
|
``id objc_retainAutorelease(id value);``
|
|
----------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
*Precondition:* ``value`` is null or a pointer to a valid object.
|
|
|
|
If ``value`` is null, this call has no effect. Otherwise, it performs a retain
|
|
operation followed by an autorelease operation. Equivalent to the following
|
|
code:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: objc
|
|
|
|
id objc_retainAutorelease(id value) {
|
|
return objc_autorelease(objc_retain(value));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Always returns ``value``.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.runtime.objc_retainAutoreleaseReturnValue:
|
|
|
|
``id objc_retainAutoreleaseReturnValue(id value);``
|
|
---------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
*Precondition:* ``value`` is null or a pointer to a valid object.
|
|
|
|
If ``value`` is null, this call has no effect. Otherwise, it performs a retain
|
|
operation followed by the operation described in
|
|
:ref:`objc_autoreleaseReturnValue <arc.runtime.objc_autoreleaseReturnValue>`.
|
|
Equivalent to the following code:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: objc
|
|
|
|
id objc_retainAutoreleaseReturnValue(id value) {
|
|
return objc_autoreleaseReturnValue(objc_retain(value));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Always returns ``value``.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.runtime.objc_retainAutoreleasedReturnValue:
|
|
|
|
``id objc_retainAutoreleasedReturnValue(id value);``
|
|
----------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
*Precondition:* ``value`` is null or a pointer to a valid object.
|
|
|
|
If ``value`` is null, this call has no effect. Otherwise, it attempts to
|
|
accept a hand off of a retain count from a call to
|
|
:ref:`objc_autoreleaseReturnValue <arc.runtime.objc_autoreleaseReturnValue>` on
|
|
``value`` in a recently-called function or something it calls. If that fails,
|
|
it performs a retain operation exactly like :ref:`objc_retain
|
|
<arc.runtime.objc_retain>`.
|
|
|
|
Always returns ``value``.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.runtime.objc_retainBlock:
|
|
|
|
``id objc_retainBlock(id value);``
|
|
----------------------------------
|
|
|
|
*Precondition:* ``value`` is null or a pointer to a valid block object.
|
|
|
|
If ``value`` is null, this call has no effect. Otherwise, if the block pointed
|
|
to by ``value`` is still on the stack, it is copied to the heap and the address
|
|
of the copy is returned. Otherwise a retain operation is performed on the
|
|
block exactly as if it had been sent the ``retain`` message.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.runtime.objc_storeStrong:
|
|
|
|
``id objc_storeStrong(id *object, id value);``
|
|
----------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
*Precondition:* ``object`` is a valid pointer to a ``__strong`` object which is
|
|
adequately aligned for a pointer. ``value`` is null or a pointer to a valid
|
|
object.
|
|
|
|
Performs the complete sequence for assigning to a ``__strong`` object of
|
|
non-block type [*]_. Equivalent to the following code:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: objc
|
|
|
|
id objc_storeStrong(id *object, id value) {
|
|
value = [value retain];
|
|
id oldValue = *object;
|
|
*object = value;
|
|
[oldValue release];
|
|
return value;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Always returns ``value``.
|
|
|
|
.. [*] This does not imply that a ``__strong`` object of block type is an
|
|
invalid argument to this function. Rather it implies that an ``objc_retain``
|
|
and not an ``objc_retainBlock`` operation will be emitted if the argument is
|
|
a block.
|
|
|
|
.. _arc.runtime.objc_storeWeak:
|
|
|
|
``id objc_storeWeak(id *object, id value);``
|
|
--------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
*Precondition:* ``object`` is a valid pointer which either contains a null
|
|
pointer or has been registered as a ``__weak`` object. ``value`` is null or a
|
|
pointer to a valid object.
|
|
|
|
If ``value`` is a null pointer or the object to which it points has begun
|
|
deallocation, ``object`` is assigned null and unregistered as a ``__weak``
|
|
object. Otherwise, ``object`` is registered as a ``__weak`` object or has its
|
|
registration updated to point to ``value``.
|
|
|
|
Returns the value of ``object`` after the call.
|
|
|