You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
88 lines
2.7 KiB
88 lines
2.7 KiB
//===- BranchProbabilityInfoTest.cpp - BranchProbabilityInfo unit tests ---===//
|
|
//
|
|
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
|
|
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
#include "llvm/Analysis/BranchProbabilityInfo.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Analysis/LoopInfo.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/AsmParser/Parser.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/BasicBlock.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/Constants.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/Dominators.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/Function.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/Instructions.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/LLVMContext.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/Module.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Support/DataTypes.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Support/SourceMgr.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
|
|
#include "gtest/gtest.h"
|
|
|
|
namespace llvm {
|
|
namespace {
|
|
|
|
struct BranchProbabilityInfoTest : public testing::Test {
|
|
std::unique_ptr<BranchProbabilityInfo> BPI;
|
|
std::unique_ptr<DominatorTree> DT;
|
|
std::unique_ptr<LoopInfo> LI;
|
|
LLVMContext C;
|
|
|
|
BranchProbabilityInfo &buildBPI(Function &F) {
|
|
DT.reset(new DominatorTree(F));
|
|
LI.reset(new LoopInfo(*DT));
|
|
BPI.reset(new BranchProbabilityInfo(F, *LI));
|
|
return *BPI;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
std::unique_ptr<Module> makeLLVMModule() {
|
|
const char *ModuleString = "define void @f() { exit: ret void }\n";
|
|
SMDiagnostic Err;
|
|
return parseAssemblyString(ModuleString, Err, C);
|
|
}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
TEST_F(BranchProbabilityInfoTest, StressUnreachableHeuristic) {
|
|
auto M = makeLLVMModule();
|
|
Function *F = M->getFunction("f");
|
|
|
|
// define void @f() {
|
|
// entry:
|
|
// switch i32 undef, label %exit, [
|
|
// i32 0, label %preexit
|
|
// ... ;;< Add lots of cases to stress the heuristic.
|
|
// ]
|
|
// preexit:
|
|
// unreachable
|
|
// exit:
|
|
// ret void
|
|
// }
|
|
|
|
auto *ExitBB = &F->back();
|
|
auto *EntryBB = BasicBlock::Create(C, "entry", F, /*insertBefore=*/ExitBB);
|
|
|
|
auto *PreExitBB =
|
|
BasicBlock::Create(C, "preexit", F, /*insertBefore=*/ExitBB);
|
|
new UnreachableInst(C, PreExitBB);
|
|
|
|
unsigned NumCases = 4096;
|
|
auto *I32 = IntegerType::get(C, 32);
|
|
auto *Undef = UndefValue::get(I32);
|
|
auto *Switch = SwitchInst::Create(Undef, ExitBB, NumCases, EntryBB);
|
|
for (unsigned I = 0; I < NumCases; ++I)
|
|
Switch->addCase(ConstantInt::get(I32, I), PreExitBB);
|
|
|
|
BranchProbabilityInfo &BPI = buildBPI(*F);
|
|
|
|
// FIXME: This doesn't seem optimal. Since all of the cases handled by the
|
|
// switch have the *same* destination block ("preexit"), shouldn't it be the
|
|
// hot one? I'd expect the results to be reversed here...
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(BPI.isEdgeHot(EntryBB, PreExitBB));
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(BPI.isEdgeHot(EntryBB, ExitBB));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
} // end anonymous namespace
|
|
} // end namespace llvm
|